• Home
  • Investors
  • Contact Parker
  • Sign In / Register
Parker Community
  • Site
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
  • Products
  • Support
  • Divisions
  • Where to Buy
  • Careers
  • About Parker
Home Parker Community Technologies Filtration Filtration Blog Choosing the Best Dust Collector for Air Quality Control in Manufacturing
Sign In / Register

Sign In

Register

Subscribe
    RSS Subscribe by email

    Manage Email Subscriptions

Categories
  • Aerospace Blog
  • Climate Control Blog
  • Electromechanical Blog
  • Filtration Blog
  • Fluid and Gas Handling Blog
  • Hydraulics Blog
  • Parker Global Blog
  • ParkerStore Blog
  • Pneumatics Blog
  • Process Control Blog
  • Sealing and Shielding Blog
  • Technologies
    • Aerospace
    • Climate Control
    • Electromechanical Group
      • Parker IPS Design Center Community
    • Filtration
    • Fluid and Gas Handling
    • Hydraulics
    • Pneumatics
    • Process Control
    • Sealing and Shielding
  • Blogs
  • Forums
  • Knowledge Base
  • Home
  • All Blogs
  • Home
  • Filtration Blog
  • Filtration Members
  • Mentions
  • Tags
Related
Follow Us
  • Follow Parker Hannifin on social media

Follow Parker Hannifin on social media:

Choosing the Best Dust Collector for Air Quality Control in Manufacturing

Posted by Filtration Team on 27 Aug 2019

    RSS Subscribe by email
Print Friendly and PDF

Choosing the Best Dust Collector for Air Quality Control in Manufacturing - Parker Industrial Gas Filtration and Generation DivisionDust collectors are important tools in any industrial manufacturing operation. They provide a cleaner environment for employees, eliminate air quality concerns, and meet environmental compliance directives. Downward flow cartridge dust collectors are commonly used in processes to remove pollutants in grinding, sanding, thermal spraying and making graphite, ink dyes, silica talc and toner. Choosing an optimally designed downward flow dust collector is key to controlling the air quality in your plant. To ensure your dust collector performs to its full potential, using the most advanced, and efficient filtration technology is critical. This winning combination will maximize overall system performance and efficiency resulting in major energy savings and reduced operating costs. Let's take a look at factors to consider when selecting a downward flow dust collector and the best type of filtration to go along with it.

Choosing the Best Dust Collector for Air Quality Control in Manufacturing - Download White Paper - Parker Industrial Gas Filtration and Generation Division

 

For detailed information on MERV efficiency ratings and other comparison data on downward flow cartridge dust collector filtration and cleaning systems, download the full white paper.

 

 

 

There are two important factors to consider when choosing a downward flow dust collector:

  1. Quality of the filter media
  2. Performance of the cleaning mechanism

 

Quality of the filter media

When it comes to dust collector filtration technology, there are basically two types of cartridge dust collection filters available:

  1. Traditional commodity filters
  2. Advanced nanofiber technology filters
Commodity filters vs. advanced nanofiber technology filters

Choosing the Best Dust Collector for Air Quality Control in Manufacturing- commodity filters vs. nanofiber filters - Parker Industrial Gas Filtration and Generation Division

Substrate material and surface coating

Traditional commodity filters are straight cellulose with one homogenous layer of cellulose fiber. Blended cellulose filters typically consist of 80 percent cellulose and 20 percent synthetic fiber. Commodity filters sometimes come with a melt-blown surface layer added to improve efficiency at capturing submicron particles.

The surface of any filter cartridge media contains holes or open space. Media with smaller holes will be more efficient at capturing fine particles. Using a material with the smallest fibers possible offers the highest efficiency rating.

The most technologically advanced type of filters available are nanofiber filters. This type of filter media uses fibers as small as 1/1,000 of a micron. To put this in perspective, there are over 25,4000 microns in an inch! That means that a nanofiber filter can capture submicron-sized particles.

Efficiency and MERV rating

Choosing the Best Dust Collector for Air Quality Control in Manufacturing - MERV-Rating - Parker Industrial Gas Filtration and Generation DivisionTo assess a filter's efficiency, the most accurate measurement available is the MERV (Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value) system. The higher the MERV rating, the better the filter's efficiency at removing submicron dust particles from the air and reducing emissions. MERV ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 20, and classified into three particle size ranges:

  • Range 1 – 0.30 to 1.0 micron
  • Range 2 – 1.0 to 3.0 microns
  • Range 3 – 3.0 to 10.0 microns

Standard commodity filters typically achieve a MERV rating of 10, meaning that they are only able to capture particles 1.0 micron and larger in size. In fact, they are not even efficient enough to be rated in range 1 because they cannot capture dust that is in the .30 to 1.0 micron size range. In other words, submicron dust passes right through commodity filters and back into the workspace and your employees’ breathing zones!

Nanofiber filters, on the other hand, achieve a MERV 15 — the highest of any standard cartridge filter. This means that nanofiber filters are 85 - 95% efficient at capturing particles 0.30 to 1.0 micron in range 1 and more than 90% efficient at capturing particles 1.0 micron-sized and larger in ranges 2 and 3.

Low pressure drop

Nanofiber filters offer the highest possible efficiency and effectively prevent particulate from building up within the filter’s substrate and restricting airflow. Because of this, pressure doesn't build up as fast as it will in a lower efficiency commodity filter. A low pressure drop means the dust collection system needs less energy to run and can use a less expensive blower.

Reduced emissions

An unavoidable by-product of the filter cleaning process is that a small percentage of the collected dust is released back into the atmosphere. Because nanofiber filters require less frequent pulse cleaning, total outlet emissions are reduced.

Commodity filters typically emit up to 35 times more dust back into the atmosphere than nanofiber filters.

 

Performance of the cleaning mechanism

To dislodge dust from the filters into a collection bin, most downward flow dust collectors use pulse-jet cleaning technology — a process where the system’s cartridges are cleaned by a blast of compressed air, causing dust to pulse off into a drawer or hopper for disposal.

Pulse-jet cleaning systems used in downward flow cartridge dust collectors are similar, but they differ in several ways that can significantly affect cleaning efficiency, ease of use and filter life. It’s important to carefully consider the performance of the cleaning system when evaluating a downward flow cartridge dust collector. Here’s what to know:

Nozzle and venturi design

These key components determine the cleaning achieved with each blast of compressed air. Systems with a poorly designed nozzle and venturi cannot pulse the air with enough velocity.

Choosing a system that is optimized for the spacing of the air nozzle, as well as precisely calculated geometry of the venturi ensures that the air is pulsed with enough power to completely clean the entire length of the filter. 

Choosing the Best Dust Collector for Air Quality Control in Manufacturing - Parker SFC Pulse Blast Pulse Jet Cleaning Technology - Parker Industrial Gas Filtration and Generation Division
 

Filter support

Some systems use an internal yoke support which can actually act as an obstruction that blocks the pulse cleaning jet — creating turbulence and less cleaning power. A system with filters that rest on rails is a better choice because there are no internal blocks at any point along the cartridge filter – resulting in up to 25 percent more cleaning power.


Filter technology

Selecting a downward flow dust collector that combines an optimized cleaning system and uses the advanced surface-loading capabilities of a nanofiber filter directly results in less pulse cleaning cycles (less compressed air use) and longer filter life. A commodity filter may pulse as much as 17 times more than an advanced nanofiber filter, resulting in considerable compressed air costs. Likewise, using nanofiber technology can double the filter life and cut replacement filter costs by 50 percent!
 

Cabinet design and quality

The design of the dust collector’s cabinet directly affects airflow and cleaning efficiency. Choosing a design that evenly distributes air throughout the cabinet is optimal.

The cabinet should be coated entirely with an electro-statically applied, powder-coated finish to prevent fading and chalking. And, it should be manufactured with 10 gauge steel and meet Seismic Zone 4 and 100 mph wind load ratings to ensure performance in harsh outdoor conditions.
 

Serviceability

Some systems use angled filters which can cause dust to accumulate against the inside of the door and on the top of the filter. When the door is opened, dust can fall on the maintenance worker. Ensure the design features a simple, replacement process, such as a push to seal closure that eliminates the need to turn knobs and hook latches.
 

Easy add-ons

Selecting a system that offers a modular design is ideal when you need to increase capacity.
 

Factory support

It’s always a good idea to choose a system from a well-known manufacturer that offers premier customer support to ensure your equipment meets all environmental requirements and operates effectively well into the future.

 

Choosing the Best Dust Collector for Air Quality Control in Manufacturing - Dust Hog SFC Cartridge Dust Collectors -  Parker Industrial Gas Filtration and Generation DivisionOne such system that meets all of the above requirements is Parker’s DustHog SFC Downward flow dust collector. The SFC effectively removes dust, fumes and smoke from industrial manufacturing processes and applications. It comes standard with the industry-leading ProTura® Nanofiber cartridge filters for more efficient and effective collection of dust emissions and capture of submicron airborne pollutant particles. The patented pulse cleaning technology provides optimized cleaning power to most effectively pulse off dust from the filter resulting in increased pulse cleaning energy, lower pressure drop, longer cartridge filter life and energy savings.

 

 

 

Watch this video to learn more about the Parker DustHog SFC Cartridge Dust Collector System:

 

Conclusion

A cartridge dust collector is an important investment that impacts the performance of the equipment in your operation and the health of your employees. To realize the greatest return on your investment and provide the safest work environment possible, your best option is to choose a surface-loading nanofiber filter and dust collection system that also offers an optimized cleaning system to gain the maximum benefits of the filter’s capabilities.

 

Choosing a Cartridge Dust Collector for Air Quality in Manufacturing Plants - Download White Paper - Parker Industrial Gas Filtration and Generation DivisionDownload the full white paper for detailed information on MERV efficiency ratings and other comparison data on downward flow cartridge dust collector filtration and cleaning systems.

 

This article was contributed by the Filtration Team.

 

Related content

Foundry Eliminates Shutdowns and Extends Baghouse Filter Life

BHA® Pleated Filter Elements Improve Dust Collection for the Foundry Industry

Filter Upgrade Improves Baghouse Performance in Industrial Manufacturing

Reducing Dust Collector Maintenance and Energy Costs in the Cement Industry | Case Study

Categories

  • Filtration
  • Industrial
  • White Papers & Articles
  • Industrial Air Filtration
Latest Blog Posts
  • Tags
  • Contact author
  • Subscribe by email
  • More
  • Cancel
  • Listening, Learning and Applying Knowledge in Product Development_Filter and Dispense System Scanner_Parker Bioscience FiltrationAlthough bulk filtration of a product prior to shipping was one of the first bioprocessing steps to benefit from single-use technology, it has been one of the last to benefit from single-use automation.

    Indeed, for many biopharmaceutical manufacturers, the process has changed very little from the days before single-use technology was adopted: the main differences have been the replacement of the stainless steel tank with a bag and the steam cross with aseptic connectors. 

    Parker Bioscience Filtration was approached by a customer to develop a solution that would address concerns around the bulk filtration unit operation. 

     

    Listening, Learning and Applying Knowledge in Product Development_Implementation of Single-Use in Drug Substance Filling Before Transportation White Paper_Parker Bioscience Filtration

     

     

     

    To learn more, download the full white paper: Implementation of Single-Use in Drug Substance Filling Before Transportation

     

     
            What were the customer's concerns?
    • Protection - As the customer was filling high potency active pharmaceutical ingredients (HPAPIs), it needed to eliminate open processing to protect the operator and the product. 

    • Standardization and simplification - The customer needed to standardize the filling platform in order to create a standard operating procedure (SOP); this would simplify training and eliminate process variation.

    • Hygiene -The customer wanted to reduce the number of people involved directly in the filling. 

     

    How Parker helped

    Working closely with the customer, Parker Bioscience Filtration developed the Generation One SciLog® Filter and Dispense System. This enabled fully enclosed automated bulk filling of the HPAPI into bottles in preparation for transportation to a filling site. 

    Parker was able to identify several benefits of automated closed filling:

    • No more false positives - The elimination of false positives meant that the customer would not be exposed to the costs (and lost time) of the quarantine and investigation process related to a false positive. Nor would it be exposed to the risk of a batch being rejected. 

    • Saving time - Comparing manual filling and automated filling, data was generated on time savings based on two filling volumes and a set batch size. If these time savings were applied to a facility producing 35 batches per year, the cost reductions generation could run into €100,000s.

    • Reduction in clean room personnel required - As the process is fully enclosed and automated, the need for QC sampling and QA oversight was reduced - this meant fewer staff were required in the clean room. 

    • Standardization driving simplification - Training and SOP became simpler as a result of standardization. The risk of deviation and human error was also reduced, and the supply chain and handling process was simplified. 

     

    The development of the generation two system

    Although we had developed a solution for a fully enclosed and automated filling process, collaboration with the customer did not stop there. The safe arrival of the bottles at a filling site was the customer's priority - and taking into account their feedback, we developed the generation two SciLog® Filter and Dispense System.

     

    How did Parker do it? Increasing the filling accuracy

    The filling accuracy of the generation one system was +/- 10 percent - initially deemed acceptable.

    However, the filling accuracy was increased to a much higher level of +/- 100 mg following feedback from the customer's QA team and our knowledge of how many bottles they needed to fill, as well as product and consumable reconciliation. 

    With the generation one system, based on a 20 L and a 500 ml fill, anywhere between 36 and 44 bottles were required. With the generation two system, the maximum number of bottles required is 40 and the minimum is 39. 

    Improving the filling process

    As the generation two system allows a rapid fill to 90 percent of target volume, the process can be run at a slower rate to ensure accuracy. This balances the requirement for product quality and process efficiency.

    Parker also introduced a J-tube system which diverts the flow of liquid to the side of the bottle. This was developed to prevent the foaming that would occur if liquid was dropped into a bottle vertically. 

    Component selection driven by process facility knowledge

    It is essential to choose materials that can support the process - and this can only be done if the full extent of the storage conditions is known. A solution may be filled following cold storage at 4°C, for instance, but may then be stored in dry ice at -78.5°C. This will have a critical impact on the choice of materials. In addition, not all products will be compatible with all of the materials used in a single-use assembly. Again, knowledge is key.

    Validating the system

    While the system was validated to perform the fully automated and contained filtration and dispense of bulk APIs, this was not the end of the validation process. 

    Shipping of the product to the final destination was also part of the solution Parker needed to provide for the customer and, therefore, this also needed to be validated. To do this, Parker subjected the bottles to further testing to demonstrate their post-shipping integrity — a crucial final step in validating the entire process.

     

    Conclusion

    Our work in developing the generation two SciLog® Filter and Dispense System underlined the importance of truly understanding what matters to a customer — and in this case, that went beyond the system's functionality.

     

    Listening, Learning and Applying Knowledge in Product Development_Implementation of Single-Use in Drug Substance Filling Before Transportation White Paper_Parker Bioscience FiltrationTo learn more download the full white paper: Implementation of Single-Use in Drug Substance Filling Before Transportation

     

     

    Listening, Learning and Apply Knowledge in Product Development_Guy Matthews_Parker Bioscience Filtration

    This post was contributed by Guy Matthews, division marketing manager, Parker Bioscience Filtration, United Kingdom

    Parker Bioscience Filtration specializes in automating and controlling single-use bioprocesses. By integrating sensory and automation technology into a process, a manufacturer can control the fluid more effectively, ensuring the quality of the final product. Visit www.parker.com/bioscience to find out more.

     

     

    Related content

    Automation of Final Bulk Filtration and Container Fill Step in GMP Environment

    Automating and Enclosing Bulk Fill Operations - the Way Forward?

    Automated Single-Use Technology and Its Impact on Quality

    Four Sources of Process Variation in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing

    Five Critical Challenges in Single-Use Bioprocessing

    How to Successfully Scale-Up Automated Single-Use Bioprocesses

     

     
    Bioprocess Pharmaceutical Filtration Team
    Bioprocess Pharmaceutical Filtration Team
    • 21 Nov 2019
    Listening, Learning and Applying Knowledge in Product Development
    Although bulk filtration of a product prior to shipping was one of the first bioprocessing steps to benefit from single...
  • Early Adoption Single-Use Technology Can Ensure Successful Process Scale-Up_Filter Trials with SciLog FilterTec System_Parker Bioscience FiltrationWhether you are running a process in a 30,000 L bioreactor in fed-batch mode, a 200 L continuous process, or have scaled-out (rather than up), you will start at small scale and look to increase the volume - scale-up - to some degree.

    However, we are recognizing that some biotech companies aren't adopting single-use automated technology until the process reaches pilot scale. This can reduce the likelihood of a successful outcome or the speed of the development process, as process rework may need to be managed further along the manufacturing development process. In some cases, changes to inefficient processes may be more difficult to implement, especially if they have already been approved.

    The adage "start with the end in mind" has never been more relevant. For scale-up to be successful, we recommend using the same automated single-use equipment, strategies and materials from the R&D stage through to manufacturing scale. That way, speed to market can be optimized through simplified technology transfer of optimal process. You will also avoid unexpected rework that may come about due to material compatibility or availability issues.

    Start as you mean to go on

    Speed to market is of critical importance, both from a return on investment point of view, but also with the benefits to patients in mind.

    Having single-use automated technology in place at the R&D stage can make the move into the manufacturing stage more efficient.

    The benefits include:

    • Materials are pre-qualified at the R&D stage and approved for use in the application.
    • Vendors are pre-qualified, audited and already in the supply chain.
    • Operator training time is reduced.
    • User confidence with the technology is increased.
    • Using scalable automation solution and single-use components increases the likelihood that control parameters developed on a smaller scale system are available on a larger system.

    And, if you use single-use technology during R&D you can also benefit from:

    • Decreased turnaround times - as components don't require cleaning or regeneration.
    • More consistent results - from using pre-made disposable manifolds, rather than building a flow path for each different processing run.

    However, there are a few common pitfalls to avoid, which include making incorrect assumptions regarding how processes will behave at larger scale.

    Ensuring successful scale-up in single-use bioprocessing webinar

    Parker Bioscience Filtration is delivering a webinar on November 12th, 2019 which will help biopharmaceutical manufacturers build a strategy for effective scale-up of filtration and single-use processes that will facilitate technology transfer, in order to avoid delays in commercialization caused by inconsistent scale-up of a single-use process between R&D and manufacturing.

    It will explain how to conduct a small-scale filtration trial using an automated single-use system at laboratory scale and examine the advantages this provides.

    The webinar will also further explore the benefits of single-use technology in both R&D and manufacturing, and consider how to ensure successful implementation of single-use automation from laboratory scale through to large-scale production.

     

    Register now for our webinar: Ensuring Successful Scale-Up in BioprocessingEarly Adoption Single-Use Technology to Ensure Successful Scale-Up_Webinar sign up now icon_Parker Bioscience Filtration

     

     

     

     

    Early Adoption Single-Use Technology to Ensure Successful Scale-Up_David Heaney_Parker Bioscience FiltrationThis post was contributed by David Heaney, market development manager (life sciences), Parker Bioscience Filtration, United Kingdom.

    Parker Bioscience Filtration specializes in automating and controlling single-use bioprocesses. By integrating sensory and automation technology into a process, a manufacturer can control the fluid more effectively, ensuring the quality of the final product. Visit www.parker.com/bioscience to find out more.

     

     

     

    Related content

    Overcoming Barriers to Single-Use Implementation

    Protecting Your Bioprocess From the Risk of Human Error

    How to Successfully Scale-Up Automated Single-Use Bioprocesses

    Automating and Enclosing Bulk Fill Operations - the Way Forward?

     

    Bioprocess Pharmaceutical Filtration Team
    Bioprocess Pharmaceutical Filtration Team
    • 30 Oct 2019
    Early Adoption Single-Use Technology Can Ensure Successful Process Scale-Up
    Whether you are running a process in a 30,000 L bioreactor in fed-batch mode, a 200 L continuous process, or have scaled...
  • Making Connections? Make the Right Choice for Your Single-Use Process_CPC Connector_Parker Bioscience FiltrationSingle-use solutions have been widely adopted on a global scale within the biopharmaceutical industry due to the many advantages and process improvements they offer.

    Key applications for single-use assemblies include the creation of process fluid flow paths, buffer/product storage solutions and sampling systems on varying scales. 

    Most of these systems will start with either a bioprocess container or a tubing option and require the ability to connect to further pieces of equipment or additional single-use systems/manifolds.

    In order to achieve this connectability, some form of connection needs to be selected — but with so many different connection types available, where should biopharmaceutical manufacturers start?

    There are many different options available when embarking on the selection process. Consideration must be given to whether the connection type needs to be aseptic to provide quick and easy sterile connections, (even in non-sterile environments) or non-aseptic (to provide quick and easy non-sterile connections).

     

    How do you choose the correct option?

    The choice should be guided by the process itself — and the capability of the manufacturing plant should also be taken into account. 

    Key factors which will determine the correct choice of connection type include:

    • Whether the connection is to be made inside or outside of a laminar airflow hood.
    • Whether the connection needs to address any specific safety requirements.
    • Process conditions and compatibility.
    • Bioburden control.
    • Experience of operatives.
    • Suitability for purpose.

    Only when these factors have been addressed can the end-user begin to fully specify the connection type required. 

     

    Connection types The Luer connector

    The Luer connector is the simplest connector. It consists of both a male and female form, and the connection is made using a twist-lock action. These connections are suited to sample lines (with syringe connectivity) and low flow narrow-bore tubing applications and can be used within a laminar airflow hood to create aseptic connections.

    However, there is a downside: potential misconnections can occur when they are not mated correctly. 

    Quick connector

    Quick connectors such as the MPC, MPX or MPU from CPC (Colder Products Company) are similar to Luer connectors in that they can be used within a laminar airflow hood to create aseptic connections. They have the added security of a push-fit feature with a secure locking mechanism. 

    Triclamp

    Triclamp (sanitary style) fittings can be used as connectors. While these are effective and secure connections, care must be taken to position the required o-ring seal within the connection prior to fixing the connection using an external clamp. The sheer size of the external clamp may make this an unsuitable method for connecting narrow bore or thin-walled tubing due to the weights involved and the potential for kinking/doubling of the attached tubing. Triclamp connections can be used within a laminar airflow hood to create aseptic connections. 

     

    Connections outside of a laminar airflow hood

    Should aseptic connections be required to be made outside of a laminar airflow hood, two options are available, which both allow the connection of varying tube sizes:

    Gendered aseptic connector

    The first option for connecting aseptically in a non-aseptic environment would be to use a gendered aseptic connector, such as CPC AseptiQuik® gendered, which has both a male and female version. The benefit of using a gendered connection is that it can help by safeguarding which lines can be connected to certain points in the process; this helps to mitigate against human error and the accidental connection of the incorrect lines/equipment.

    When designing single-use assemblies using a gendered connector approach, care must be taken to ensure that the correct male / female side is designed into each part; this in itself can also create some areas for error to creep in. 

    Genderless aseptic connector

    Should the end-user not have any concerns over an accidental connection to the incorrect lines/equipment, or simply want to remove the error of male/female connector type which can creep in during design, there is the genderless aseptic connector, such as CPC AseptiQuik® genderless. These connectors take out the requirement for designing in the correct male/female orientation and can enable universal assemblies to be manufactured and connected with many other assembly/equipment types. 

    Both gendered aseptic connectors and genderless aseptic connectors operate via a mechanism that enables connection in non-sterile environments to be made possible. This is because of the use of proprietary seals which mate together before a protective seal is removed, thus keeping the process stream in its aseptic/sterile condition. 

     

    Connecting stainless steel and single-use

    Should sterile connections between traditional stainless steel biopharmaceutical processing equipment and single-use assemblies be required, there is another option:

    Steam-to connectors

    Steam to connectors, such as CPC Steam-Thru®, work by allowing steam to pass through the section connected to the stainless steel equipment. Once steamed and connected, a valve within the connector is manipulated, creating a sterile or aseptic flow path. 

     

    Conclusion

    It is apparent that there are many connections capable of creating or maintaining an aseptic/sterile environment, but without the correct process condition assessment, operator care or design considerations, biopharmaceutical manufacturers could be looking at a costly connection failure. 

     

    Making Connections? Make the Right Choice for Your Single-Use Process_Single-Use: The Next 5 Challenges to Conquer White Paper_Parker Bioscience Filtration

     

     

    Download our white paper to find solutions to more single-use challenges: Single-Use Technology: The Next 5 Challenges to Conquer

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Making Connections? Make the Right Choice for Your Single-Use Process - Graeme Proctor_Parker Bioscience Filtration

     

    This post was contributed by Graeme Proctor, product manager (single-use technologies), Parker Bioscience Filtration, United Kingdom.

    Parker Bioscience Filtration specializes in automating and controlling single-use bioprocesses. By integrating sensory and automation technology into a process, a manufacturer can control the fluid more effectively, ensuring the quality of the final product. Visit www.parker.com/bioscience to find out more. 

     

    Related content

    Eliminating Leaks and Faults: Single-Use vs Stainless Steel Systems

    Five Critical Challenges in Single-Use Bioprocessing

    5 Benefits of Single-Use Technology vs Stainless Steel

     

     

    Bioprocess Pharmaceutical Filtration Team
    Bioprocess Pharmaceutical Filtration Team
    • 15 Oct 2019
    Making Connections? Make the Right Choice for Your Single-Use Process
    Single-use solutions have been widely adopted on a global scale within the biopharmaceutical industry due to the many advantages...
  • Technologies
    • Aerospace
    • Climate Control
    • Electromechanical Group
      • Parker IPS Design Center Community
    • Filtration
    • Fluid and Gas Handling
    • Hydraulics
    • Pneumatics
    • Process Control
    • Sealing and Shielding
  • Home
  • All Blogs
  • Home
  • Filtration Blog
  • Filtration Members
  • Mentions
  • Tags
Follow Us
  • Follow Parker Hannifin on social media

Follow Parker Hannifin on social media:

Parker Hannifin Parker Hannifin

  • Products
  • About Parker
  • Investors
  • Community
  • Careers

Global Operations Global Operations

  • Divisions
  • Sales Companies
  • Worldwide Locations
  • Distribution Network
  • ParkerStoreā„¢ Network

Company Information Company Information

  • Newsroom
  • Event Calendar
  • Working with Parker
  • Product Brands
  • History

Global Support Center Global Support Center

  • Support
  • CAD
  • Where to Buy
  • Contact Parker
  • Manage Online Orders
Parker - Engineering Your Success
  • Site Map
  • Safety
  • Privacy Policies
  • Terms and Conditions
Ā© Parker Hannifin Corp 2019