When designing a leak-free instrumentation system, one of the first steps to ensuring safety and reliability is to select the right tubing for the intended application. No system integrity is complete without this critical link and its compatibility with the rest of the components. In this post we list four key parameters to consider when selecting quality instrument tube for use with Parker A-LOK® and CPITM tube fittings.
Parker’s instrument tube fittings have been designed to work in a wide variety of applications that demand the utmost in product performance. Their compatibility with selected tubing is critical for providing consistently high-level of reliability.1. Material compatibility
The most important consideration in the selection of suitable tubing for any application is the compatibility of the tubing material with the media to be contained. Table 1 lists common materials and their associated general applications. It also lists the minimum and maximum operating temperatures for the various tubing materials.
In addition, Parker instrument fittings are designed to work on like materials. Stainless steel fittings should be used only with stainless steel tubing, 6MO fittings with 6MO tubing, etc. The practice of mixing materials is strongly discouraged.
Table 1. Common tubing materials with their applications and operating temperatures.2. Tubing hardness
The key is to select tube material which is softer than the tube fitting material. For example, Stainless Steel tubing should be specified as Rb 80 or less hardness value. Parker A-LOK® / CPI™ Tube Fittings have, however, been tested on tubing up to Rb 90 hardness level with excellent performance.3. Wall thickness
Proper wall thickness is necessary to accommodate accepted safety factors relative to desired working pressures. Tube tables published in Parker’s literature, list the tube Outside Diameter (OD) sizes and Wall Thickness combinations per material for safe use with Parker A-LOK® and CPITM tube fittings. Do not use tube with wall thickness values which fall outside of the table ranges.
All working pressures are calculated following the recommendations contained within the ASME B31.3 Chemical Plant and Petroleum Refinery Piping Code and ASME B31.1, Power Piping. All calculations are confirmed via rigorous and extensive testing procedures at our Parker R&D Laboratories. Each calculation utilises an allowable stress figure that incorporates a 4:1 factor of safety.
All testing is carried out to replicate actual working conditions where possible. Parker does not ‘support’ tube to facilitate failure at certain points as this does not truly represent the forces that our products would see in ‘real-time’ applications.
Not all manufacturers support their assemblies’ pressure rating claims with extensive testing. In these cases it is important to understand the implications associated with using unverified recommendations.Note: Gas Service
Special care must be taken when selecting tubing for gas service. In order to achieve a gas-tight seal, ferrules in instrument fittings must seal any surface imperfections. This is accomplished by the ferrules penetrating the surface of the tubing.
Penetration can only be achieved if the tubing provides radial resistance and if the tubing material is softer than the ferrules. Thick walled tubing helps to provide resistance and the table below provides a range of wall thickness options available for safe use with Parker tube fittings. The ratings in blue indicate the combinations of diameter and wall thickness which are not suitable for gas service.
Table 2. Maximum working pressures (in psig) for imperial tube in 316/316L Stainless Steel material based on tube O.D. size and wall thickness combinations.4. Elevated temperatures
At elevated temperatures, a de-rating factor should be applied to the working pressure listed in the Parker tube tables. Please see the table below for the de-rating factors for the common materials Parker offers in our A-LOK® tube fittings range.
In all cases, tube fitting assemblies should never be pressurised beyond the recommended working pressure.
Table 3. This table lists the de-rating factors which should be applied to the working pressures for elevated temperature conditions. Simply locate the correct factor in this table and multiply this by the appropriate value in the pressure tables e.g. Table 2 (above) for 316/316L SS.
* Dual-certified grades such as 316/316L, meet the minimum chemistry and the mechanical properties of both alloy grades.
Register today for our industry-leading SBEx (Small Bore Expert) training and learn how to specify and install efficient, safe and leak-free small bore tubing systems.
The Right Tubing + The Right Fitting + SBEx Training = High Integrity Solution.
Article contributed by Dave Edwards, product manager - tube fittings, Instrumentation Products Division Europe.
Mixing high- and medium-pressure fittings or incompatible parts makes systems unstable, inefficient and potentially dangerous. At worst, it can cause a potentially fatal explosion.
At Parker, we’re all about making our products safe as possible and helping customers to minimise risk. Safety doesn’t happen by accident, so you need to know how to avoid the risk and what to do if you come across a mixed-pressure connection that could be hazardous.Dangerous connections
Our engineers have recently come across situations where customers have created system connections using components with different pressure ratings. These instances are rare, but they can and do happen; creating unnecessary risks for everyone using the system.
If a Medium pressure tube is machined with High pressure tooling, this reduces the wall thickness below safe limits, and can lead to catastrophic failure. Similarly, combining a High pressure fitting with a Medium pressure tube means the male and female connections will not fit correctly. It may seem like the threads match, but the gland nuts will not engage to the required depth for the system to remain safe. The mechanical properties of the metals used in High and Medium pressure fittings are very different, meaning medium pressure units cannot withstand the application of high pressure.
Different pressure-rated fittings just don’t mix, and there’s no safe way to combine Medium and High pressure elements. Mixing different types of connections, product lines or parts from different manufacturers is also dangerous and removes any warranties.
Remember, just because something "can be done", doesn't mean that it "should be done"!How it happens
The diagram below shows how the positions of collars and glands are different, depending on the pressure of the connection.
Fig. 1. The difference in positions of collars and glands in medium and high pressure connections.Avoiding and reducing risk
We recommend that you never mix together:
All Parker Autoclave Engineers fittings carry our manufacturer’s name, part number, material, heat code and maximum pressure rating. We also make it easy to distinguish between different pressure ranges by clear notch markings on High pressure nuts.
Parker Instrumentation Products Division provides specialist SBEx (Small Bore Expert) safety training on correct and safe assembly of instrument connections to improve safety and skills across the engineering sector. For further support you can contact your local Parker Instrumentation Products distributor or visit our website.
Fig. 2. Notch marking on Parker Autoclave Engineer's High pressure fitting nuts provides differentiation from Parker's other pressure fittings.Making a safe connection
If you need to assemble Medium pressure with High pressure in one system, we recommend the use of Parker adapters. For safety reasons, the Maximum Allowable Working Pressure (MAWP) rating is based on the lowest rating of any component (Maximum 20,000 psi).
Fig 3. Male-to-male medium-pressure to high-pressure adapter.
The second adapter (Fig. 4) overcomes the problem of the final rotational position not being predictable, making it safe and practical to use when positioning elbow/tee fittings and valves.
Fig. 4. Male-to-male adapter.
If you come across a mixed-pressure arrangement, you should immediately isolate, remove and replace it with a proper connection using matching and compatible Parker parts. Otherwise, there is a real risk of failure or burst that could lead to catastrophic failure, resulting in injury or death.
Learn more about Parker Autoclave Engineers range of fittings and tubing suitable for low, medium and high pressure applications:
Article contributed by Franck Grignola, product manager EMEA - high pressure, Instrumentation Products Division Europe.
Securing leak-free connection of impulse lines to manifolds for applications that use differential pressure flowmeters is a subject that has taxed instrumentation engineers for more than a century. Back in 1910, when the very first orifice plate installations made an appearance, they involved 33 connections and 16 lengths of tubing! Thanks to the development of highly integrated manifolds, today’s installations often only require just two tube connections. However, ensuring the long-term integrity of these connections remains a contentious issue.
The first manifolds on the market used NPT taper threads for their tube connections. Despite being the bane of installers’ lives, this type of technology continues to enjoy widespread use today, with most manifold manufacturers still offering it as an option. But much better tube connector technologies are now available.What’s wrong with taper threads?
Unlike compression type tube fittings with one or more ferrules, taper thread fittings rely on the threads themselves to provide the seal. During make-up, progressively larger diameter threads on the fitting are compressed into progressively small diameter threads on the manifold, until eventually there is no clearance left between the crests and roots of the threads and they effectively form a metal-to-metal seal.
NPT taper thread fittings are popular because they are relatively inexpensive, but they also have distinct disadvantages. The fittings cannot easily be installed with a specific torque, which makes it all too easy to crack or distort the female part by applying too much torque, or to apply too little, resulting in potential leak paths due to incorrect thread cling. There is also always some thread clearance due to manufacturing tolerances, which means that if the fitting is not tightened to the point where thread deformation creates a metal-to-metal seal, there is a spiral leak path. Furthermore, the upper and lower machining limits of NPT taper threads mean that there might only be two turns of thread engagement in an assembled connection; the most reliable means of preventing this is to use, if possible, a matched pair of male and female parts produced by the same manufacturer.Taper thread can suffer from limited thread engagement
Another major disadvantage of NPT fittings is that their radial orientation cannot easily be adjusted without compromising connection integrity.
Most installers of NPT fittings elect to use some form of thread sealant to help prevent leaks. This usually comprises a fluid carrier which transfers a filler compound into the threads and then cures. Unfortunately, not all sealants act as lubricants and they are also very easy to misapply. Too much sealant can cause system contamination, which can result in unseated valves or blocked lines, while too little can allow the threads to gall (cold weld) during installation, requiring replacement of the entire manifold and tubing system. A further problem is that the fitting cannot be adjusted once the sealant has cured.
A popular alternative approach is to use PTFE tape as a sealant. This additionally acts as a lubricant during assembly and facilitates tighter connection of taper thread fittings – although it can lead to over-torquing. Another issue with PTFE tape is that it has a tendency to shred and cause system contamination. For this reason, its use is often prohibited in sensitive instrumentation systems.
Parker now offers two manifold connection solutions – PTFree connect and inverted A-LOK – which completely eliminate the need for taper threads, PTFE tape and thread sealant.PTFree connect™
Our PTFree connect system provides a simple means of connecting impulse lines to manifolds without involving the use of taper threads, PTFE tape or thread sealant. Available as an option for every type of manifold valve block that Parker produces, PTFree connect offers different versions that accommodate metric tube sizes from 6 to 12 mm and imperial sizes from 1/4 to 1/2 inch.
Parker’s PTFree connect system is available on all types of manifold
Manifolds fitted with the PTFree connect system are exactly the same as their standard counterparts, except that their inlet/outlet and drain/test ports can be factory fitted with male adapters, supplied complete with a preassembled nut and ferrule(s). The (parallel) thread on the male adaptor is screwed into the manifold and uses the same type of stainless steel sealing washer as the valve heads, to provide a high-pressure leakproof and bubble-tight connection. The adaptor is securely locked by a cam or locking plate mechanism. We have used this connection principle well over a million times, so you can be confident that it’s a tried and trusted system.
Installation of PTFree connect manifolds is simple. A variety of connection bodies can be used – including straights, elbows and tees – and all angled components can be freely swivelled to facilitate secure positioning. And if anything does go wrong during installation, the sacrificial element is the male adapter – not the manifold – so the cost of remedial action is considerably less than with any other type of connection.Inverted A-LOK fittings
More recently, we developed inverted A-LOK fittings, designed specifically for connecting impulse lines directly to manifolds. Like our PTFree connect system, these also eliminate taper threads and the need for PTFE tape or thread sealant, but they do not involve the use of adapters – the tube is fitted directly to the manifold. Each of the two manifold ports forms the female half of a connector and is machined with a cone-shaped orifice and a standard parallel (non-tapered) thread. Each male part comprises a tube and an inverted nut, with threads on its outside surface, which drives two ferrules forward during assembly; the pressure seal is provided by the front ferrule – not the threads of the connector.
Inverted A-LOK fittings facilitate direct-to-manifold connections
A key advantage of our inverted A-LOK fittings is that the tube is not twisted during installation – all make and remake motion is transmitted axially to the tubing. Since there is no radial movement of the tubing, it is not stressed and its mechanical integrity is not compromised. These fittings are suitable for both thin wall and thick wall tubing, can be used with a wide variety of tubing materials and accommodate repeated disassembly and remake. However, they still require careful installation. If the internal cone becomes damaged, the manifold block will need to be replaced. And due to cross-hole drilling in the block, the technology is not available on all types of manifolds.
Spencer Nicholson, product manager, instrument manifolds, Instrumentation Products Division Europe.
Industrial settings with strenuous applications, such as thermal cycling and vibration, are recognised as some of the toughest environments for tube fittings. In all cases such applications demand highly precise, leak-free technology to ensure protection from vibration and thermal cycling. For example, in power generation, nuclear and chemical plants, worker and atmospheric safety is business-critical.
Engineers face numerous options when choosing tube fittings for instrumentation, process and control systems and equipment. In most cases, buyers need a solution that will minimise risk, prevent leakage and provide robust value for money.
In instrumentation installations such as impulse pipework, typically a three piece (single ferrule) or four piece (double ferrule) design is preferred. While both types of fittings have their own merits, the four piece fittings are slightly better known in the market. But in some cases, there are definite advantages for choosing a three piece, single ferrule design.Benefits of single ferrule designs
With just three pieces required - a nut, body and single ferrule - this type of fitting is easy to install. The ferrule design also provides a strong anti-vibration hold on the tube.
Single ferrule fittings typically offer six core benefits:
Many engineers constructing fluid or gas handling systems aim to eliminate potential leak paths. This approach also applies to the design of tube fittings.
With single ferrule fittings such as CPI™, only two potential leak paths need sealing. But double ferrule fittings have three or more paths to seal, depending on the fitting design and composition.
2. Sealing mechanism
With double ferrule designs, the front ferrule contacts the body seat over the entire surface. This causes the end load to be distributed over a wide area.
With Parker’s CPI™ design, there is less body seat contact; the end load is concentrated over a smaller area. Higher contact pressure enhances the ability of the single ferrule solution to seal low density gases, which means it can out-perform its double ferrule counterpart in some applications.
The CPI™ fitting also has the benefit of the one-piece ferrule, utilising Parker’s unique Suparcase™ system. This offers better corrosion resistance and is less likely to be damaged in service; but it’s not available on the front ferrule in twin ferrule tube fitting designs.
3. Dampening vibration
Tubing vibration can affect the ferrule seal. However, with single ferrule designs, a light compression grip at the rear of the ferrule isolates seal points from system vibration. This creates a cushioning effect, providing excellent vibration resistance – again, a potential advantage over double ferrule designs.
4. Better performance in temperature cycling
During temperature cycling, metals naturally expand and contract; this causes dimensional changes in fitting connections. With single ferrule fittings, the ferrule features a ‘spring loaded’ effect; this creates a constant tension between the fitting body and nut.
The spring action compensates for cycling changes. By storing excessive force in the bowing action of the ferrule, it maintains effective sealing points. There is no corresponding spring action with double ferrule designs.
5. Ease of installation
The CPI™ single ferrule tube fitting uses a Molybdenum Disulfide coated nut, which reduces the torque required to make up the assembly by as much as 40%. This coating also gives the added advantage of precise and consistent re-makes. As a result, the fitting can last longer in service - reducing potentially costly maintenance work.
6. Precision assembly
Both single and twin ferrule designs can potentially seal all leak paths, as long as they are assembled precisely. With double ferrule fittings, there’s scope for incorrect alignment, lining fittings up backwards, or leaving a ferrule out completely.
Ultimately, with fewer components, there is less that can go wrong; single ferrule solutions are quicker and easier to assemble, so the scope for error is reduced. With Parker’s CPI™, fittings are sold completely assembled and ready for immediate use.
Offering superior corrosion resistance, the CPI™ product series is manufactured to the highest quality standards and available in a range of sizes, materials and configurations. There is documented heat code traceability on stainless steel fittings for nuclear and other critical applications.
Article contributed by Dave Edwards, fittings product manager, Instrumentation Products Division Europe.
The Ash Probe is a portable instrument for measuring the ash content of coal, providing the user with highly accurate readings within seconds. Instantaneous readings can be made of coal quality on stockpiles, trains or trucks, allowing customers to check the quality of incoming coal supplies and specifications against their suppliers’ claims.
Widely used in the mining industry, it allows suppliers to verify the quality of their product and therefore have confidence that the delivery will be accepted by the client ensuring the agreed price per tonne is paid.
Ash Probe was the first portable product to be developed by Bretby Gammatech (now a part of Parker's Instrumentation Products Division) with the first one sold to a mine in South Wales. Since then, hundreds of Ash Probes have been delivered all around the world, with many of these customers also purchasing Ash Eye or Lab Ash equipment.
Like all Parker Bretby Gammatech’s products, the Ash Probe uses natural gamma radiation, with no radioactive sources.
The Ash Probe has been developed to withstand harsh environments and is therefore renowned for being extremely robust. It is currently being used in temperatures down to -50oC in Mongolia, China, as well as in temperatures over 40oC in many African countries.Ash Probe – features and benefits
Pic. 1. Parker's Ash Probe with a display unit.How to operate the Ash Probe
The Ash Probe comprises two main parts: a probe and a display unit. To obtain an ash reading, the probe is pushed into the coal pile or truck to be tested. After a few seconds an ash result shows on the display unit.
In order to obtain an accurate assessment of the ash content of the whole pile (or wagon load) the probe is inserted at several locations. This is repeated until the desired precision level has been reached.
In Pile Mode up to 99 probings per pile can be made and data from up to 99 piles can be stored. In Truck Mode up to 12 probings per truck can be made and data from up to 600 trucks can be stored.
Calibration is readily achieved by the customer using the supplied calibration sample gathering equipment.
Tests on a wide range of coals from over twenty countries on five continents have shown that the Ash Probe can measure the ash content to closer than 1% (1σ) ash. In some cases better than 0.5% (1σ) accuracy has been achieved with high-grade anthracite.Applications
The Ash Probe is currently being used by customers around the world to provide quick testing for the ash content of:
Article contributed by Gary Wain, piping products, product manager, Instrumentation Products Division Europe of Parker Hannifin.
The quest to find and retain skilled machinists and engineers is harder than ever with Eurozone countries experiencing their lowest ever levels of unemployment.
Instrumentation Products Division Europe (IPDE) and Parker globally recognizes that providing competitive benefits is just one factor in achieving this. To develop a high performing and stable workforce we must engender the right values and behaviours coupled with a shared vision, supported by solid strategies and delivered through engaging leadership. But what about beyond this?Apprentices will define and deliver our future.
In 2017, IPDE introduced its apprenticeship scheme aimed at attracting and developing the finest mechanical engineering apprentices in our regions, who will define and deliver our future for many years to come.
A mechanical apprenticeship within IPDE affords talented people the opportunity to ‘earn, learn and qualify’ and also prepares the foundations for a fantastic career in one of the world’s most successful organizations.
“Having worked with various apprenticeship schemes in my previous roles, I was keen to introduce this scheme into IPDE so that we can develop and grow our own talent from within. It also enables us to protect our business for the future as our most skilled professionals move into retirement.”
Andrew Spivey, General Manager of Parker Instrumentation Products Division Europe.Former apprentices have made impressive progress.
IPDE has a strong track record of developing people through previous apprenticeship schemes. Former apprentices have made impressive progress in the organization and currently hold roles such as Division Supply Chain Manager; Production Manager; Lean Manager; Deputy Production Manager; Value Stream Champion; Senior Quality Engineer and Design Engineer.
Neil Shapland, Materials, Planning and Production Manager at IPDE, who began his career with Parker as a manufacturing apprentice 24 years ago, worked within several key areas including value stream manager roles and planning and production manager. He believes that his apprenticeship and the skills he learnt stood him in ideal ground to progress within the organization. He said:
"I am passionate about the manufacturing apprenticeship programme and the positive impact it will have on the business as a whole. I believe it provides the ideal opportunity to nurture and develop first class engineers, our next top manufacturing leaders and committed team members of the future."
Neil Shapland, Materials, Planning and Production Manager at Parker Instrumentation Products Division Europe.
Article contributed by Michelle Liney, Group HR Manager, Instrumentation Products Division Europe of Parker Hannifin.
The quick, accurate, and inexpensive measurement of Trihalomethanes (THMs) creates numerous opportunities to improve the water treatment process. THM levels can be lowered throughout the distribution system and chemical usage can be optimized to save money. What’s more, quick process adjustments can be made to control THM formation when surface water Total Organic Carbon (TOC) characteristics alter due to seasonal or unusual weather conditions. Where before you might have had limited THM data, you can now greatly expand the sampling frequency and monitoring locations to help you better understand the THM formation characteristics of your water source, treatment process, and distribution system.Surface water supply matrix changes
Both human activities and seasonal changes can affect source water, altering the mineral characteristics of the water as well as the reactivity of its dissolved organic carbon. A water plant may observe no significant changes in the quantity of TOC due to seasonal events, but they may find their THM level has changed. Frequent measurements of THM can help operators better understand the reactivity changes of their source water.Coagulant evaluation test
A successful coagulation process depends on identifying the correct coagulant type and optimum dosage under suitable environmental conditions of pH and alkalinity such that the coagulant will remove the maximum TOC, UV254, and turbidity, and form easily settleable floc. However, without the ability to measure THM concentration of the finished water in real time, the plant operator will not know if the coagulation process has been optimized to also remove the maximum amount of THM precursors. With the ability to easily measure THM concentration in finished water, the plant operator can adjust the coagulation process to achieve minimal THM formation potential. Additionally, this allows the treatment plant to supply safe drinking water with the required level of disinfectant concentration while also maintaining lower DBP levels throughout the entire distribution system.Real-time monitoring of THM sampling locations
Trihalomethane formation in water distribution systems is a function of water travel time, temperature, and physiochemical and biological characteristics of pipe deposits within the distribution system. The real-time monitoring of THM at different sampling locations will help water distribution operators to identify problematic inorganic/organic pipe deposits that cause increased levels of THM formation.Water quality model evaluation/water quality trend
Hydraulic modeling of a water distribution system is an important tool for water quality management. In addition to basic hydraulic characteristics, modeling identifies water aging and predicts disinfectant decay and DBP formation. Incorporating new data from frequent THM analysis in combination with disinfectant level data will help plant operators build an improved hydraulic model for water quality trend analysis, providing critical information for more targeted and efficient water plant operation.Flushing program
Water quality levels throughout the distribution system are maintained by systematic flushing programs designed to reduce stationary water in dead end lines and increase flow volume to minimize water age. The distance of water from the water plant, dead ends in the pipe, and low water usage may cause water quality deterioration. Lower residual disinfectant levels indicate the need to flush, which can cause a significant water loss. By measuring THM concentration in addition to disinfectant levels, operators can better decide on the location and length of flushing to minimize treated water loss.Water age evaluation
Water age is emerging as an important issue due to increased THM formation in water distribution systems. Excessive contact time caused by dampened peak-hour demands, distribution piping configurations, areas of reduced water requirements, and fire protection storage can result in elevated THM concentration. Identifying and then reducing dead spaces and stagnation in water storage tanks and looping pipe configurations in water distribution systems will reduce water age. These actions can be triggered appropriately by monitoring THM levels in storage tanks and key locations in the distribution system.The Parker THM analyzers
Parker’s On-Line THM Analyzer and benchtop THM Analyzer are easy to operate, integrated Purge-and-Trap Gas Chromatographs (GC) that measure THM concentration at ppb levels in less than 30 minutes right at your own facility without tedious sample preparation.
This integrated system is a powerful tool that can help operators optimize water treatment at the plant and evaluate water age in the distribution system for improved control over the formation of THMs.
Pic. 1. Parker's On-Line THM Analyzer.
Pic. 2. Parker's benchtop THM Analyzer.
Article contributed by Kazi Hassan - technology development manager (water) at Parker Hannifin, Instrumentation Products Division.
Related content on water quality:
Since the NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers) MR0175 standard was updated to ISO status in December 2003, there has been an air of confusion on what and how products conform to NACE. Some manufacturers simply buried their heads and try to ignore the standard, some simply decided that they would not pursue NACE product related business, some only certify to old, out of date versions of the standard, and others simply used the wording of certain clauses within the standard as a way of supplying product from materials that do not actually meet the requirements of NACE MR0175.
Parker has taken NACE compliance very seriously and invested a lot of time to ensure that not only did we understand the consequences of the standard but what we actually put out to our customers in the market place was accurate and met the criteria of what the standard is advising the Oil and Gas Industry.
Engineers from Instrumentation Products Division Europe attended a conference organized by the authors of the NACE MR0175/ ISO 15156 document and arranged for one of the authors to visit our manufacturing facility at Barnstaple to discuss its implications and how we as a manufacturer of saleable goods should be certifying the materials we use for NACE compliant products.Declaration of Conformity
Managing emissions is a major challenge for many companies. In Europe alone, a typical refinery can lose between 600 and 10,000 tonnes of fugitive emissions every year; and the majority of those losses are estimated to be caused by plant equipment, such as process to instrument valves and small bore fluid system technologies.
Valve leakage is believed to account for around 50 per cent of emissions within the chemical and petrochemical industries. That can place a major financial burden on companies - not just due to potential plant inefficiency, but also the potential costs of repairing leaks, wasting energy and environmental fines.
Reducing emissions can help businesses to protect the environment, reduce waste and save valuable time and money in the process. Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) and end users involved in commissioning may find it helpful to follow a series of checks - alongside any existing processes - to determine prospective supplier capability.Adherence to international Standard ISO 15848.
International standard ISO 15848 sets a requirement for zero emissions for processes involving hazardous fluids and volatile air pollutants. The standard is split into two parts:
ISO 15848 defines three leakage classifications that specify maximum leakage rates, with Class A being the most stringent.
Parker products have been compliant with ISO 15848 for some years now.
Pic.1. Lloyd’s Register verification for the Pro-Bloc® 15mm process to instrument valves dates back as far as July 2007.Verifications and third-party approvals.
Typical industry procurement practices require certificates of approval or third-party verifications as a condition of supply. Reputable valve manufacturers, including Parker, can provide signed and witnessed certificates - along with verification from industry-leading organisations and technical advisors such as Lloyds, TUV and DNV.
If verifications are provided by an unknown third party, engineers and procurement specialists may want to satisfy themselves with the quality and level of certification offered - ensuring that any named verifiers are trusted experts in their field. And it’s important that suppliers can provide access to any stated certification, as proof of capability and to ensure practices are up-to-date.
Experience supporting major companies and being on approved vendor lists can also be a useful indicator of supply quality. Manufacturers of process to instrument valves who are working with oil majors typically have to pass stringent pre-qualification checks and approval systems. For example, Shell’s robust enterprise framework agreement requires suppliers to:
Passing these tests is a strong indicator of supplier credentials. Parker is proud to have recently secured a five-year extension to its framework agreement with Shell following a recent factory audit and witness-tested Type Approval Test. The extension was secured due to Shell being satisfied with Parker products and service over the previous five years.
Pic.2. Parker’s MESC compliant Double Block and Bleed valve.Industry expertise and training.
In offshore applications, the implications of insufficient expertise or training can carry significant risk. It’s therefore imperative that any suppliers demonstrate their understanding of the business environment and relevant operations.
Asking suppliers for details of their testing practices and procedures, familiarity with legislation and adherence to industry standards will help to build a clear picture of suppliers’ relative experience and credentials.Suggested questions for potential suppliers.
EPC contract engineers and procurers commissioning process to instrument valves may find it helpful to consider the following areas when considering potential suppliers:
Article contributed by Jim Breeze - Flange Products Product Manager at Parker Hannifin, Instrumentation Products Division Europe.
From surgical equipment to cooking pans to skyscrapers, stainless steel has transformed the world as we know it today. Stainless steel is present in our daily lives and has made a significant impact in a wide variety of industrial applications. The oil and gas industry, in particular, has been no different, as operating conditions and extracting methods made stainless steel a very cost-effective, convenient and reliable choice.
Higher operating pressures and temperatures
Despite worldwide efforts coming to rely on renewable energy for power generation, oil and gas remain the skeleton of the power generation energy supply at present. Many conventional reserves have been exhausted and oil and gas reservoirs found in very inaccessible locations and hostile environments are now usual targets for exploration. Pressures and temperatures that were deemed in the past as not viable are at present common operating parameters, imposing considerable limitations on existing equipment and technology and making the oil and gas power generation industry face serious material related challenges.
The emergence of the “Corrosion Resistant Alloy”
Nearly a decade ago, numerous oil and gas producers started specifying and using the low end of the Corrosion Resistant Alloys (CRAs) spectrum, including super austenitic stainless steels, duplex and super duplex varieties. This trend was mainly driven by failures experienced on existing equipment, where the basic stainless steel range could not perform appropriately. Awareness of corrosion cost and assets impact and safety have also been drivers for corrosion resistant alloy usage. Today, nearly every oil and gas producer includes CRAs in their portfolio. However, there is yet a lot to be learned on how other CRAs could help optimise performance and integrity. In addition, the lower corrosion resistant alloy range is just an enhancement to the traditional stainless steel grades used for decades, but those have limitations as well and are not the solution to every problem.
Meeting the demands of an ever-changing environment
Figure 1: Parker 6 Moly tubing
Over the last months, we have observed increased demand for more special alloys, such as the nickel-based ones. What is more, end users do not only seem to be interested in using those advanced materials but for the first time, they also require specific melting methods, controlled manufacturing routes and extensive mechanical and corrosion testing methods to ensure maximum equipment performance. This is just another indication of harsher environments and highly demanding production routes.
Both, onshore and offshore applications are major contributors to the CRAs fast-growing demand. Onshore shale gas production has flourished in the past years due to the availability of new drilling technology, by using advanced materials to fight the extreme corrosion effects of shale gas and the higher operating pressures. On the other hand, the offshore market, especially deepwater exploration, is emerging too, due to the development of subsea technology. Both those sectors are bound to grow very rapidly in the future, and so CRAs high demand is expected to continue for years to come.
Parker Instrumentation Products Division, with over 40 years of experience in CRAs, offers an extensive range of equipment in a variety of materials, including super austenitic grades (commonly referred to as 6 Moly), duplex and super duplex steels, Nickel- Copper alloys (Alloy 400), Nickel alloys (Alloy 825, Alloy 625, Alloy C276) and Titanium. We have the knowledge and expertise to face the fast pace of CRAs development and continuously changing and demanding market needs. We can help you engineer your success.
Table 1. Common uses of Corrosion Resistant Alloys.
Clara Moyano is innovation engineer - material science at Parker Hannifin, Instrumentation Products Division, Europe.